Genetic diversity underpins the livestock breeders’ ability to improve the production potential of their livestock. Therefore, it is important to periodically assess genetic diversity within a breed. Such an analysis was conducted on U.S. dairy goat breeds and this article is an overview of that work. In March 2014, pedigree files were obtained from the American Dairy Goat Association (ADGA) in order to conduct a genetic diversity evaluation using pedigree information and assess how well the bucks in the National Animal Germplasm Program (NAGP) gene bank represent various goat breeds. NAGP is part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The primary function of the gene bank is to serve as a strategic reserve of genetic diversity for the livestock industry to use, particularly in the event of a local or national crisis such as rebuilding breeds after an epidemic. Additional material is in the gene bank for use by breeders and researchers for DNA analysis or reintroduction of genetics that are no longer commercially available. The NAGP gene bank currently includes more than 22,700 animals and 778,000 units of germplasm and various tissues. Of this collection, 409 animals (9,657 units) are goats. Within the goat collection, 146 animals (1,900 units) are from dairy breeds and, within that, 73 animals (1,542 units) have semen stored.
With pedigree information, various measures of genetic relatedness and diversity can be computed. For example, the genetic relationship between a parent and offspring is 0.5 since half of the offspring’s genes came from each parent. Full siblings also have half of their genes in common by descent and a relationship coefficient of 0.5, while half siblings have a relationship coefficient of 0.25. While these computations are basic, full pedigrees with many generations result in complex relationship values best computed by software programs designed to do so. Knowing the pedigree of animals also allows us to compute the inbreeding coefficient for each animal. How this average inbreeding level changes per unit of time for the breed is referred to as the rate of inbreeding (ΔF).
Since each breed has its own unique start date, which impacts inbreeding levels over time, comparing breeds based on birth year lacks usefulness. Therefore, animals were assigned a generation number so breeds could be compared on the same basis. Founder animals are defined as having both parents unknown and were assigned to generation zero. Then, subsequent generations were calculated as:
g = 1/2 (gs + gd) + 1,
where gs is the generation number of the sire and gd is the generation number of the dam.
Effective population size (Ne) is defined as the number of individuals that would generate the current rate of inbreeding in a randomly mated population. While there are several ways to compute effective population size, we selected and used the following formula:
Ne = 1/(2ΔF)
Generation intervals (GI) were computed by regressing generation number on birth year.
Pedigree Analysis Results
Breed specific results are available on the NAGP website at: http://ars.usda.gov/Main/docs.htm?docid=23140. Between breed results are summarized here. Table 1 shows the inbreeding statistics for each breed. All results were limited to those animals reported as Purebred (PB) or American (AM); however, all animals were included in the pedigree analysis to establish ties between animals, including cases where the ancestors are from another breed.
Our analysis suggests that 99% of current animals among breeds have an inbreeding coefficient greater than zero. The generation number the breeds reached this level was: generation 7 for Alpine, Nigerian Dwarf, and Saanen; generation 8 for Nubian and Toggenburg; generation 9 for Lamancha and Oberhasli; and generation 12 for Sable.
Implications for Breeders and NAGP
Inbreeding can be part of a mating plan to establish or maintain characteristics of interest within a line, for example. Alternatively, and far more prevalent, is incidental inbreeding that happens over time when lowly related animals are mated and inbreeding slowly accumulates until all animals have some level of inbreeding. In the case of planned linebreeding, inbreeding can be used to fix (make homozygous) alleles for a trait, leading to a more uniform phenotype. All inbreeding, whether intentional or incidental, leads to more homozygosity and, eventually, a potential loss of lower frequency alleles and thereby a loss of genetic diversity. The increase in homozygosity with inbreeding can also bring out deleterious recessives that were previously hidden in a population; this is known as inbreeding depression and can lead to reduced performance. Purging deleterious recessives is part of establishing an inbred line. While a uniform phenotype is desirable to the breeder and consumer, it also limits the ability to respond to market changes if the formerly undesirable alleles become preferred.
Developing a genetically diverse collection of dairy goat semen requires access to dairy goats for collection and/or semen contributions of previously collected bucks. Because artificial insemination is not as commercially established as with the dairy cattle industry, greater effort is required on the part of NAGP to obtain the samples needed for the gene bank. Figure 3 shows the status of dairy breed collections in the NAGP gene bank as a percent of the targeted germplasm and number of bucks collected.
The NAGP dairy goat collection is short of the targets for capturing genetic diversity across breeds, but this can be quickly reversed. Expansion of the dairy goat collection is necessary to develop a reserve of genetic diversity for worst case scenarios. We therefore wish to encourage breeders to work with us in identify existing cryopreserved semen or from bucks that may be collected in the near future to add to the gene bank. Information about NAGP can be obtained at: http://www.ars.usda.gov/main/site_main.htm?modecode=30-12-05-00. Donations can be arranged by contacting Carrie Wilson at email@example.com.
FAO. 2000. Secondary guidelines for development of national farm animal genetic resources management plans: management of small populations at risk. UN Food and Agric. Org. http://www.fao.org/AG/AGAInfo/resources/en/pubs_gen.html. Accessed March 12, 2009.
Nicholas, F. W. 1989. Incorporation of new reproductive technology in genetic improvement programmes. Pages 201-209 in Evolution and Animal Breeding. W. G. Hill and T. F. C. Mackay, ed. CAB Int., Wallingford, U.K.